The AI landscape doesn't move in one direction — it lurches. Some techniques leap from experiment to table stakes in a single quarter; others stall against regulatory walls, technical ceilings, or organisational inertia that no amount of hype can dislodge. Knowing which is which is the hard part. The State of Play cuts through the noise with a rigorously maintained index of AI techniques across every major business domain — classified by maturity, evidenced by real-world adoption, and updated daily so you always know where you stand relative to the field. Stop guessing. Start knowing.
A daily newsletter distilling the past two weeks of movement in a domain or two — delivered to your inbox while the index updates in the background.
Each dot marks the weighted maturity of practices within a domain — hover for a brief summary, click for more detail
AI that automates returns, warranty claims, and refund processing including eligibility determination and approval. Includes automated claim adjudication and fraud screening; distinct from claims assessment in finance which handles insurance claims rather than product returns.
Returns, warranty, and claims processing automation has crossed from experiment to production at forward-leaning retailers and insurers, but the vast majority of organisations have not yet deployed it. That gap defines the practice's leading-edge position. Purpose-built platforms now process tens of millions of items annually, and the warranty management market is projected at $6.67B in 2026, yet most supply chain executives still report inventory trapped in returns pipelines and an inability to resell eligible goods quickly. The ROI case is proven for early movers -- vendors document 700x cost reductions on claims processing ($0.07 vs. $50 per claim), sub-five-day claim resolution, and measurable revenue retention through exchange automation. Scaling remains the problem. Insurance claims adoption has accelerated sharply (8% to 34% full AI adoption YoY 2024–2025), and regulatory frameworks (NAIC Model Bulletin adopted in 24 US jurisdictions) are now accelerating rather than blocking deployment. Yet fraud is escalating faster than defences mature: return fraud is the single largest fraud category, and only a small fraction of retailers consider themselves prepared for AI-enabled threats. E-commerce returns platforms demonstrate 98% accuracy and sub-48-hour deployment, but data silos and legacy core systems remain the primary adoption barriers for enterprises. The defining tension is between strong unit economics at vendor and operator levels and persistent organizational, fraud, and system integration challenges that keep most of the market in pilots rather than production.
The vendor ecosystem has consolidated around a handful of scaled platforms. Optoro, now part of Blue Yonder, processes 25M items annually for 20 of the largest US retailers, achieving 60% waste reduction; the acquisition signals a strategic bet on unifying consumer-facing returns with warehouse-level processing. Loop has processed 55M+ returns across thousands of Shopify brands, retaining $2B+ in merchant revenue through exchange automation, and recently expanded into European logistics via Sendcloud integration. Narvar's IRIS engine handles 42B interactions for enterprise clients, with its Shield fraud-prevention product reaching general availability at American Eagle and Estee Lauder (40% revenue retention, 50% call centre reduction).
Warranty automation is producing measurable results at smaller scale. Dyrect's platform, deployed across 300+ brands, cut processing time from 12 days to 4.8 and auto-approves 60% of claims. Happy Returns' Return Vision AI verifies products at greater than 99% accuracy, catching an average of $218 in fraud per flagged item. In adjacent insurance claims, Travelers now has 20,000+ AI users processing 1.5M claims annually, with over half eligible for straight-through automation.
These gains coexist with sharp headwinds. A survey of 215+ supply chain executives found 57% have 5-15% of inventory value locked in returns, representing $75B in annual operational cost. Fraud losses keep climbing -- 64% of organisations report higher losses year-over-year despite 98% integrating AI into fraud workflows. Paradoxically, 94% of fraud leaders plan to add headcount, suggesting AI has surfaced more work than it has eliminated. Only 3% of retailers feel adequately prepared for AI-enabled fraud, even as 71% increase prevention budgets. The operational complexity of returns -- inventory trapping, resale logistics, legacy system integration -- keeps the gap wide between what leading vendors can deliver and what most organisations are ready to absorb.
— BCG Insurance Excellence Benchmark: >90% of claims processed manually; STP just above 50% in personal lines, <⅓ in motor. €5B annual efficiency opportunity remains. Agentic AI identified as lever for high-variance claims resistant to deterministic automation.
— 76% of U.S. insurers deployed gen AI; STP jumped 8%→34% YoY 2024–2025; advanced AI achieves 70–90% STP for simple claims. Cost per claim 20–40% reduction ($25–36 vs. $40–60); Aviva reduced assessment time 23 days, improved routing 30%, complaints 65%.
— 50% of consumers use gen AI to draft refund claims; 85% accept borderline return behaviors. Riskified deployment: 75% chargeback reduction, conversion 50%→75–80%, annual losses $1M→$150K–$200K. Signals consumer adoption and merchant AI response.
— Critical assessment: returns automation improved operational efficiency but failed to reduce fundamental cost structure—automated 'the smallest cost layer' while architectural routing and delays remain unchanged. Negative signal on practice maturity ceiling.
— Gartner 2023: retailers combining RPA, AI inspection, and cloud inventory achieved 185% ROI within first year. Returns cost $12 per item; 70% of labor tasks automatable. Self-service portal cut support tickets 45%, fraud attempts 22%, achieves 15–20% recovery from secondary channels.
— $60 sweater return costs $47 manual (22 minutes, 3 reps). Proper automation: 22→<4 minutes, 70%+ support-ticket deflection, 90-day payback for brands processing 200–1,000 returns/month.
— Critical automation pitfall: AI layered onto incomplete workflows creates false confidence. Speed doesn't ensure safety when coverage gaps, missing endorsements, and risk-transfer issues hide in faster systems.
— Adoption gap evidence: top-quartile carriers process 60-70% STP; bottom half under 30%. Documents accuracy (95-97% clean, 88-94% messy documents) and regulatory audit requirements as deployment barriers.