The AI landscape doesn't move in one direction — it lurches. Some techniques leap from experiment to table stakes in a single quarter; others stall against regulatory walls, technical ceilings, or organisational inertia that no amount of hype can dislodge. Knowing which is which is the hard part. The State of Play cuts through the noise with a rigorously maintained index of AI techniques across every major business domain — classified by maturity, evidenced by real-world adoption, and updated daily so you always know where you stand relative to the field. Stop guessing. Start knowing.
A daily newsletter distilling the past two weeks of movement in a domain or two — delivered to your inbox while the index updates in the background.
Each dot marks the weighted maturity of practices within a domain — hover for a brief summary, click for more detail
AI that screens transactions and shipments against export control regulations, dual-use goods lists, and trade restrictions. Includes classification assistance and denied party screening; distinct from sanctions screening which checks entities rather than goods and technology classifications.
AI-powered export control screening has proven operational value at large multinationals but remains bifurcated by organisational scale and integration capacity. The practice applies machine learning to classify goods against dual-use regulations, screen transactions for export restriction violations, and assess end-use risk—distinct from sanctions screening, which checks entities rather than technology classifications. Leading enterprises deploy platforms at scale through SAP GTS, Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE, and Descartes Visual Compliance, automating 95%+ of sanctioned party screening and reducing manual processing 70-80%. Yet adoption fractures sharply at mid-market: cost barriers ($250K-$2M+ implementation), regulatory volatility (May 2025 AI Diffusion Rule rescission, January 2026 H200 policy reversal), and skills shortages (77% trade professional gaps persisting since 2022) create persistent adoption friction. BIS enforcement intensity remains high ($252M+ penalties in early 2026), driving compliance urgency—but 63% of mid-market firms report 3-6 week processing delays despite vendor ecosystem maturity, indicating implementation barriers outpacing tool availability.
The vendor ecosystem consolidates around SAP GTS (95%+ automation in sanctioned party screening, 30-50% cost reduction, 18-24 month ROI), Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE, Descartes Visual Compliance (65,000+ users, 28,000 annual man-hours saved), and Oracle GTM, with mature SaaS deployments accelerating through cloud integration (AWS Marketplace availability). AI application broadens beyond classification to anomaly detection and relationship mapping: Kharon ClearView reduced Military End-User screening time by 90% through visualized entity risk networks. Enterprise adoption continues: Resonac's ONESOURCE rollout across 220+ jurisdictions, Thomson Reuters CoCounsel reaching one million professionals (including trade compliance specialists), and consulting adoption (KPMG SAP GTS implementations) all signal production-grade deployment. Gartner notes trade compliance solutions remain "typically siloed and tactically deployed" rather than strategically integrated, indicating continued maturation pathway.
Enforcement environment intensified significantly in 2026. BIS and OFAC enforcement action surged: Applied Materials $252.5M settlement (February 2026) for 56 unauthorized reexport charges through Korea routing; Teledyne FLIR $1M penalty for specification changes missed during re-classification; Cadence Design Systems $140M (July 2025) for unlicensed EDA software exports. OFAC penalties accelerated to $265M in 2025 (up from $49M in 2024, 14 enforcement actions). These major penalties drive compliance investment: 43% of trade professionals increased hiring, 38% boosted technology spending, 34% expanded training (Thomson Reuters 2026 survey). However, a critical enforcement-policy gap emerged in April 2026: federal enforcement spending ($122M annually) trails smuggling diversion ($2.5B in a single case), and Justice Department prosecutions of six smuggling networks in consecutive weeks revealed systematic evasion through South Taiwan subsidiaries and Southeast Asia data centers. A $2.5B chip smuggling case—the largest U.S. export control violation to date—exposed serial-number spoofing tactics and sophisticated transshipment routing, demonstrating that smuggling remains pervasive despite high-profile BIS penalties. Compliance-side adoption barriers persist despite enforcement intensity: 63% of mid-market firms report 3-6 week export compliance validation delays, and practitioners document widespread single-regime screening (OFAC OR BIS but not both), creating compliance blind spots. The gap between regulatory expansion and enforcement capacity directly drives demand for advanced transaction screening and entity relationship mapping: vendors now positioning AI-powered classification and anomaly detection as force-multipliers for under-resourced compliance teams. BIS criminal prosecution is an active mechanism (26 DTCF cases, up to 20-year liability). Vendor ecosystem responded with agentic AI shifts: SAP announced the International Trade Classification Joule Agent for H2 2025 with AI reasoning over product characteristics for automated ECCN/HS assignment, signaling shift from rule-based GTS checking toward agentic reasoning. Enterprise adoption continues—CSIS survey of 31 major U.S. technology exporters shows 76% report $10M+ delays, 50%+ lost customers, and 40% hired external compliance consultants. Regulatory uncertainty remains elevated with no replacement framework for May 2025 AI Diffusion Rule rescission, though January 2026 policy shift allowing case-by-case H200 review signals pragmatic recalibration.
— Peer-reviewed finding: export controls fail to prevent technological development, instead promoting indigenous innovation; underscores critical need for detection mechanisms to compensate for controls' limited effectiveness.
— Named enforcement case: Coastal PVA Technology settled BIS charges for $1.7M after exporting EAR99 brushes to Entity List Chinese manufacturers without license, demonstrating enforcement intensity for even low-risk classified items destined to restricted parties.
— House hearing coverage of $2.5B chip smuggling case (largest U.S. export control violation), detailing evasion techniques (serial-number spoofing) and enforcement gaps, demonstrating need for sophisticated transaction screening.
— CSIS survey of 31 major U.S. technology exporters shows 76% report >$10M delays, >50% lost customers, 40% hired external consultants, and 85% factor delays into sales planning, signaling urgent market demand for compliance solutions.
— FDD expert briefing identifies three enforcement gaps (capacity, allied alignment, evasion methods), documents DOJ $2.5B chip smuggling indictment, and proposes DUV lithography equipment as controllable choke point.
— Expert FDD analyst documents $122M annual export control enforcement spending vs. $2.5B in smuggling diversion, proposing due diligence policy solutions and identifying persistent evasion through Asia-Pacific data centers.
— SAP announces International Trade Classification Joule Agent for H2 2025 with AI reasoning over product characteristics and trade regulations for automated ECCN/HS code assignment, signaling vendor shift to agentic AI in export compliance.
— Official BIS enforcement page documenting sustained multi-sector enforcement including Applied Materials $252M settlement (Feb 2026), Teledyne FLIR $1M penalty (Feb 2026), and 26 criminal prosecutions by DTCF, demonstrating enforcement maturity and escalation.