The AI landscape doesn't move in one direction — it lurches. Some techniques leap from experiment to table stakes in a single quarter; others stall against regulatory walls, technical ceilings, or organisational inertia that no amount of hype can dislodge. Knowing which is which is the hard part. The State of Play cuts through the noise with a rigorously maintained index of AI techniques across every major business domain — classified by maturity, evidenced by real-world adoption, and updated daily so you always know where you stand relative to the field. Stop guessing. Start knowing.
A daily newsletter distilling the past two weeks of movement in a domain or two — delivered to your inbox while the index updates in the background.
Each dot marks the weighted maturity of practices within a domain — hover for a brief summary, click for more detail
AI that identifies target accounts showing buying signals and coordinates sales and marketing engagement. Includes cross-channel account engagement scoring and buying committee detection; distinct from lead scoring which scores individuals rather than accounts.
ABM signal identification uses AI to detect which target accounts are showing buying intent—through website engagement patterns, third-party intent data, organisational changes, and cross-channel behavioural signals—then coordinates sales and marketing response. The technology is proven and mature. Platforms are analyst-validated and widely deployed: 71% of B2B marketers actively implement ABM with 137% average ROI. Multi-signal frameworks deliver measurable lift: organisations using four-dimensional signal scoring (technographic, behavioral, firmographic, real-time engagement) achieve 34% engagement rates vs 11% for firmographic-only approaches, with 2.8x higher pipeline conversion and 47% ABM conversion improvement at named enterprises like Snowflake. Yet execution remains the binding constraint. Only 26% of organisations achieve "very successful" outcomes, and failure rates of 68-80% trace overwhelmingly to discipline gaps—poor data hygiene, sales-marketing misalignment, static account lists—rather than platform capability. The signal landscape is shifting: 94% of buying groups rank preferred vendors before first contact, but 50-70% of B2B research occurs in informal channels invisible to third-party intent providers, pushing practitioners toward first-party signal validation. Buying group complexity is rising: groups now average 13 internal and 9 external participants (doubled for AI purchases), multiplying the signal identification challenge. The core tension is whether premium platforms costing $50-100K annually deliver marginal value over leaner alternatives built on cost-efficient stacks, given that execution discipline determines outcomes far more than tooling choice.
Demandbase, 6sense, and Terminus lead a crowded vendor field of nine-plus platforms, all GA and feature-rich. Demandbase holds Gartner Leader status for five consecutive years; its AccountID enhancement integrates first-party data from the Engagio acquisition, claiming 80% more signal and 50% better accuracy. Demandbase Orchestration (March 2026) now detects intent surges, engagement shifts, and buying group expansion, with reported 83% pipeline velocity increases and 3x conversion lifts when signals activate rapidly. New entrant SalesIntel (April 2026) offers Signal360 monitoring thousands of signals across 30+ categories with claimed 95% accuracy. GitLab runs 6sense in production for target-account list building and funnel progression. PageUp deployed Demandbase to full production in six weeks with campaigns outperforming advertising benchmarks. Adoption breadth remains real: 771-marketer survey shows 71% actively implementing ABM, with 49% calling it their highest-ROI channel. Yet only 15% use dedicated ABM platforms—48% cite cost and 32% cite implementation complexity as barriers. Leaner stacks built on Cognism, LinkedIn Ads, and CRM-native tooling generate $700K-plus pipeline without the $50-100K annual commitment, confirming signal identification capability is commoditising. Signal quality challenges persist: 60% of sellers waste time on accounts that appear engaged but never convert; 43% of marketers battle unreliable targeting data; false positives undermine ROI despite platform sophistication. Buying group complexity is rising with 13 internal and 9 external stakeholders now the norm (doubled for AI purchases). Stage-based progression models incorporating first-party signal validation and account-fit scoring are emerging as differentiators over static platform-driven campaigns. The programmes that succeed share discipline: tight data hygiene, first-party signal integration, sales-marketing alignment, and buying-group mapping strategy rather than platform-first investment.
— Named case studies with metrics: Ascent Risk Management achieved 175% pipeline lift, Smartsheet achieved 84% MQL increase from signal-driven targeting. Categorises signals into first-party, engagement, and third-party for operational implementation.
— 6sense (leading ABM signal platform) expands agentic RevvyAI signal-to-action automation to all customers at no additional cost, signalling platform maturity and market expansion toward accessibility.
— Research-backed false positive analysis: 40% of accounts flagged 'in-market' show zero IT spend; false positive rates exceed 60%. Case study shows 3x accuracy lift (25% to 78%) when signals layered with verified intelligence—identifies critical limitation.
— Named customers (Justworks, Pylon, Anrok, Perplexity) document real-world signal-based selling outcomes: 6.8X ROI in 5 months, 4.2X ROI with 3X meetings booked, $300K+ pipeline in 3 months. Demonstrates measurable adoption across independent organisations.
— 2026 State of the BDR Report (MarketOne + 6sense partnership): 90% of BDRs deploy signal tools but only 2% report signals drive account queuing, only 19% use signals for outreach timing. Critical adoption gap between capability and operational usage.
— Independent practitioner analysis documents deployment barriers: most B2B leaders cannot quantify intent data ROI. Identifies three working use cases and three failure modes in signal operationalization, providing pragmatic assessment of practice limitations.
— Practitioner operational framework documenting signal decay (8x conversion drop between 1-min and 1-hour response). Defines Tier-A vs Tier-B signal filters and qualification criteria, showing how high-performing teams operationalise signal identification in production.
— Practitioner cost-benefit analysis benchmarking signal-based selling (3.8-6.4% reply, 1.2-2.4% positive) vs intent data (1.2-2.1%, 0.3-0.8%). Cost comparison: signals $2K-$8K/year vs intent $12K-$60K+/year. Shows economic tradeoff favoring signal stacking over premium platforms.